The Mines and mineral bill, formally called the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Union Minister for Coal and Mines G Kishan Reddy moved the bill during Parliament’s monsoon session, on the same day the government tabled three other bills, including the Tribunals Reforms Bill and the Kerala Alteration of Name Bill.
The mines and mineral bill amends the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, the law that has governed India’s mining sector for nearly seven decades.
What is the Mine and Mineral bill?
A mines and mineral bill, in simple terms, is legislation that decides who can dig up India’s underground resources, on what terms, and who gets taxed for it. The original MMDR Act of 1957 gave the central government regulatory control over mining, while states kept powers over leases and taxation. This 2026 amendment does not scrap that law. It updates specific sections dealing with leases, exploration funding and mineral taxation, according to the bill text published by PRS Legislative Research.
Who introduced the Mines and Mineral Amendment bill 2026?
Union Coal and Mines Minister G Kishan Reddy introduced the bill in the Lok Sabha on August 10. This is not his first mining reform. Reddy also piloted the 2023 and 2025 amendments to the same Act, both aimed at opening the sector to more private investment and critical mineral exploration.
What are the amendments introduced in this monsoon session?
According to the bill text, the mines and mineral bill proposes several specific changes.
- Leaseholders can apply to add new minerals to an existing mining lease, instead of applying for a fresh one.
- For critical and strategic minerals such as lithium, graphite, nickel, cobalt, gold and silver, no extra payment is needed to add them to a lease.
- For other minerals, leaseholders must pay a royalty equivalent amount, and auctioned mines must also pay the relevant auction premium.
- The cap that allowed captive mines to sell only 50 per cent of their annual output is being removed entirely.
- The National Mineral Exploration Trust will be renamed the National Mineral Exploration and Development Trust, with a wider mandate to fund mine development, not just exploration.
- Deep seated minerals, found more than 200 metres below the surface, get lease area extensions of up to 30 per cent under a composite licence and 10 per cent under a mining lease.
- A new authority is proposed to register and regulate mineral exchanges, which are electronic platforms for trading minerals and metals.
Separately, the Centre wants greater control over mineral bearing land and tighter limits on how much tax, cess or levy a state government can impose on mineral rights. Unrecovered dues that a state has not already collected before the new law takes effect would be treated as invalid, though any amount a state has already collected will not need to be refunded, according to the bill’s text.
Why was this Mines and Mineral amendment needed?
The government’s Statement of Objects and Reasons cites a specific problem. States have imposed inconsistent taxes and cesses on mineral rights, sometimes introduced only after mining operations had already begun. This created what the bill calls uncertainty in the fiscal regime, meaning mining companies could not predict their total tax burden year to year.
There is also a legal backdrop. The Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling in the Mineral Area Development Authority case overturned an earlier 1989 judgment and held that royalty on minerals is not a tax, which opened the door for states to impose their own levies on mineral rights. A follow up Supreme Court order in August 2024 allowed states to raise such demands only for transactions from April 2005 onwards, and let mining companies pay dues in installments over 12 years starting April 2026, with interest and penalties waived for dues before July 2024.
The new mines and mineral bill builds directly on that legal history, aiming to bring more predictability going forward.
Are these amendments related to the US-India trade deal?
Not directly, though the timing overlaps closely. India and the United States signed a critical minerals cooperation framework on May 26, 2026, in New Delhi, covering mining, processing, recycling and financing across the rare earths supply chain. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed the agreement on the margins of a Quad Foreign Ministers meeting. Quad governments have said they intend to mobilise up to 20 billion US dollars for the initiative through loans, guarantees and long term purchase agreements.
Separately, India’s 2026-27 budget proposed rare earth corridors in Odisha, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, aimed at mining, refining and manufacturing rare earth magnets used in electric vehicles and clean energy technology. The mines and mineral bill is domestic legislation and is not part of the US trade framework itself, but both efforts point toward the same broader goal, reducing India’s dependence on a small number of countries for critical mineral supply.
Will mining access get easier for companies?
For domestic mining companies, yes, in several practical ways. Removing the 50 per cent sales cap on captive mines lets companies sell more of what they produce in the open market. Waiving extra payments for adding critical minerals to an existing lease removes a procedural and financial hurdle for companies expanding into lithium, cobalt or nickel extraction.
For foreign investment tied to deals like the one with the US, the bill does not grant any country specific access. It changes the domestic rules that apply equally to all lease holders, Indian or foreign owned, operating in India. Industry executives quoted by Business Standard said the changes could ease retrospective tax worries for miners and downstream steelmakers, though this reflects industry reaction rather than a government claim.
Does the Mines and Mineral Bill favour adani or ambani?
This is a fair question given how often mining and infrastructure policy gets linked to large conglomerates in public debate. Based on available reporting, no government minister or opposition leader has named Adani or Ambani in connection with this specific bill as of publication. No verified statement links this amendment to any single company.
Where are India’s minerals found?
India holds meaningful reserves across several mineral categories, spread unevenly across states.
| Mineral | Leading State | Approximate National Rank | Source |
| Iron ore | Odisha | 4th largest producer globally, 289 MMT in FY25 | Ministry of Mines |
| Bauxite | Odisha (about 73 per cent share) | 5th largest producer globally, 24.7 MMT in FY25 | Ministry of Mines |
| Coal | Jharkhand | 3rd largest producer globally | UPSC Mapping |
| Copper | Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand | Domestic reserves, import dependent overall | Ministry of Mines data |
| Limestone | Rajasthan | 3rd largest producer globally | Ministry of Mines |
| Manganese ore | Odisha, Madhya Pradesh | 7th largest reserve globally | UPSC Mapping |
| Rare earth elements (monazite) | Odisha, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh | Estimated 7.23 million tonnes of rare earth oxides | Government data |
The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 was introduced but not yet passed as of this report. It will need debate and a vote in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, followed by Presidential assent, before it becomes law.
Given that the previous MMDR amendments in 2023 and 2025 both cleared Parliament within weeks of introduction, mining companies, state governments and critical mineral investors will be watching closely for how quickly this version moves.
